The Five Stupidest Nuclear Weapons

As long as man has been able to mix together chemicals, he’s been blowing the heck out of anything that moves. About seventy years ago, he hit the apotheosis of “blowing the heck out of stuff” power: the nuclear bomb. But apparently dropping it from planes wasn’t enough. Oh no, we had to put that kind of power into backpacks, stick it in grenade launchers, and fire it out of cannons. Here are five weapons that prove that not only was the Cold War pointless, both sides were completely insane.

1.
The Davy Crockett

crockett

No, we’re not referring to the King of the Wild Frontier. We’re talking about a nuclear weapon you could issue to soldiers, you know, for when they were out fighting. If this sounds insane, that’s because it is. But that didn’t stop anybody from putting together the Davy Crockett.

The entire idea was instead of dropping huge bombs from airplanes onto unsuspecting enemies, in this case the Russians, you could issue the infantry with their own personal nukes, mounted on a recoilless rifle, and let them irradiate the other side while fighting. Because, of course, there was absolutely no way the infantry (the guys getting shot at a lot and having to make spur of the moment decisions) would ever misuse what amounts to a nuclear grenade launcher.

The really insane thing about the Davy Crockett was the terrible design. Recoilless rifles have all the accuracy of a drunk urinating, so the Davy had to be designed to be pointed at something’s general direction and launched; it’d wipe out anything within a mile radius of where it landed and had a three mile maximum range. And, this being the ‘50s, it wasn’t a clean bomb, either. No, the Davy was just as radiation-heavy as any other nuclear weapon, so basically the only way to shoot it safely was to be downwind and hope the other side was three miles away.

Thankfully, somebody in the Army was actually sane and this was never actually used in combat. Just deployed… in places like Vietnam.

2.
Atomic Annie

annie

The Army was confronted with this newfangled “atomic bomb” back in the ‘50s, and they weren’t sure how to use it. They knew they wanted one, because every military man deeply loves munitions that can blow the living hell out of absolutely everything. But they just weren’t sure how to work it into the Army’s usual repertoire of rifles, cannons, and their conventional stuff that goes boom. Luckily, somebody was there with the single most terrifying “solution” to a “problem” you’ll hear all day.

Atomic Annie, aka the M63, was an enormous cannon that fired nuclear bombs. Yes, you read that correctly. It fired nuclear bombs. Why? Because why the hell not? This is the military, d*#n it, guns that shoot bombs are like peanut butter that magically creates chocolate in your mouth. Never mind that combining gunpowder with a nuclear bomb sounds more dangerous than letting Gary Busey outside without the shock collar, let’s go full steam ahead!

What’s really unnerving is that Atomic Annie is simply the biggest of their ridiculous cannons. The Army had plenty of options for using weapons that had “THIS WILL GO TERRIBLY WRONG” practically stenciled onto the crates, from teeny little cannons to big honking guns designed to be used as standard artillery, except with radioactive death. Granted, the Russians were just as stupid and slamming out nuke cannons as fast as the collective would allow, but first of all, they were just following the US’s lead and secondly, it was Soviet Russia. Buying a blender from them is fraught with risk, forget buying any munitions that aren’t the AK-47. We expect a little more from the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave, like not putting nuclear weapons into cannons.

3.
MK-54 SADM

sadm

OK, enough about launching nukes out of cannons and on the end of rifles. Let’s talk about something that’s even more stupid: making nukes into time bombs and expecting some poor shmuck to lug them around on his back.

The MK-54 SADM is better known as a “suitcase nuke” or a “backpack nuke”, but is better described as “the world’s most destructive time bomb”. The idea was, if a soldier on the field ran into a situation where, somehow, turning the entire field into a parking lot made sense, he could sling this thing off his back, set the timer, and run as fast as possible in the opposite direction, preferably towards something like a helicopter or a spaceship, desperately hoping he’d set the timer just long enough for him to get out of the blast range, or at least that he was downwind. If not, well, he was kind of up the creek.

There were a lot of problems with this idea, beyond the fact that it was insane. For one thing, nuclear weapons, no matter how tiny they are, are not exactly light; these things weighed fifty pounds or more, which made the term “suitcase” kind of a misnomer. Basically, the soldier carrying this thing had to haul that, his pack, and a gun to actually defend himself in a sane manner. Secondly, atomic bombs are fragile things, and so are bomb timers, so humping a big old bag of death across a couple of mountain ranges didn’t make a lot of sense. Luckily, we never got the chance to find out.


Loading...
Loading...

Comments

  • Waqaskash

    world is full of insane ppl…

  • http://richi.co.uk/ Richi Jennings

    Blue Peacock was actually designed to be deployed in Germany, not England. Still amazingly dumb though.

    Surprised you didn't mention the MIM-14 Nike-Hercules, which was designed to fire a 30KT warhead into a squadron of incoming bombers. *shudder*
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIM-14_Nike-Hercules

  • Andeman0861

    Somebody needs to spend a little more time doing research. First of all the W 54 was PART of the Davy Crockett system. It was a dirty little nuke desigend to be an area denial weapon, i.e. you either went around the contaminated area or you racked up mass casualties going through it. Since the majority of the D C systems were deployed in the Fulda Gap they were there to deter Soviet Motor Rifle formations from moving into western Europe. Is the idea of tactical Nukes scary? Hell yeah! But did the threat of using them deter the Soviets? Also Hell Yeah!

    • Bill

      In addition, the W54 was also the nuclear portion of the SADM, so the author only really talks about three systems. I enjoy how some people love to use the word “stupid” to describe things they really don’t understand, and just copy and paste off the internet (really the most reliable of sources)

  • guest

    What’s missing here is the obviously most stupid nuclear weapon so far, project Pluto. Basically a flying nuclear reactor armed with nuclear bombs. Once the nuclear bombs have been deployed the plan was to fly Pluto criss-cross the enemy territory at low altitude with supersonic speed, killing pretty much everything in its path due to the intense radiation emitting through its ramjet propulsion system.
    http://www.merkle.com/pluto/pluto.html
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565615/posts

  • Logo Design

    WOW….. Such a Horrible Weapons….!!!!

  • Heidi Tentee

    Too bad wit is not synonymous with intelligence. The Soviet Union was not just a country with a different economic system. It was a form of government that would not tolerate any form of criticism. They even encouraged you to inform on your neighbors or relatives if they did not toe the communist line. They even had a convenient website to inform on your neighbors who didn’t want the government running their healthcare system. (Oops. That’s O’Bama, not Gorbachev) Anyway, if you didn’t like your neighbors, instead of dumping a bottle of roundup on their lawn, you informed the KGB that they drank Budweiser instead of Vodka, and they would disappear.

  • John Boar

    The MK-54 SADM was a bit more nuanced than the author describes. The concept was actually well thought out and immense training went into the entire program. The SADM was not for “situations” but instead as part of the Exercise Reforger where the US Army’s 12E designated trained soldiers would place the SADM in special selected emplacement chambers built into large public structures such as bridges/dams. Then, and only if, when the Soviet Army came west through the Fulda Gap would these be deployed as buffers against the Soviet forces until the US military could return, hence the name REturn-FORces-to-GERmany. 

    Furthermore the device had an electroplanewave generator which had a timer built in … allowing the technician the ability to set the device off with enough time to be in Tahiti if he wanted. (Since the military occupational specialty or MOS was combat rated, it was only for men) The device was not heavy or awkward to carry. It was 58 1/2 pounds encased in a foam rubber with the weight well distributed. The half-foam outer-shell back support was easy to re-position after making an airborne/helicopter jump.  So in short, it was designed well, built with specific purpose and in truth … was the most accurate weapon in the nuclear arsenal. It was not an offensive weapon but defensive. 

    Maybe you should reconsider your assessment … 

  • Correctin’ you

    You have your “___wind” terms confused. You want to be UPwind when you detonate nukes, not DOWNwind. DOWNwind means the wind is blowing radiation toward you, UPwind means you are UPwind from the radiation, and the radiation is being blown away from you.

     

  • Artie Compton

    “Granted, the Russians were just as stupid and slamming out nuke cannons
    as fast as the collective would allow, but first of all, they were just
    following the US’s lead…”

    Aaaaand I stopped reading. Try keeping your inaccurate and pretentious Generation Y scorn out of historical commentary next time. It makes for a lazy and irritating article. Yes, I realize you were trying to be funny. Apparently the only way you know how to be funny is to talk about how everyone in America was an idiot warmongering Nazi until you came along to point out the obvious.

Become our reader - RSS

Advertising

WeirdWorm on Facebook

Advertising / Cool At Other Blogs

Audio Podcast / Listen and download!

Best on WEB / Advertising